Discussion about this post

User's avatar
nonrenormalizer's avatar

I hope this is written tongue-in-cheek, because otherwise, it's one of those cases where someone manages to instantly shatter their credibility. Going forward with this blog would require not so much Gell-Mann amnesia, but a Gell-Mann lobotomy.

I'm very tempted to go into full rant-mode, but it's late so I'll limit myself to the following:

1. While it was discovered at a single collider, the signal for the Higgs was found by two separate experiments (i.e. independently designed detectors) at different locations along the LHC ring. Sure, systematics can be correlated within the same location but it would be quite unlikely for the same outdoor rumble to show up in this particular signal and in no other search.

2. The LHC experiments did not stop their work on Higgs related physics after its discovery -- even now, more precise measurements of its mass and decay width are being made, see https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13663 .

3. The Higgs field gives rise to the mass of elementary particles, and thus contributes to things like the stability of the proton, and rate of radioactive decay (and hence why the sun is able to shine continuously). The fact that the Higgs field couples to known particles in proportion to their masses may mean it couples to otherwise undetectable massive particles as well, which may be one way of ascertaining what dark matter is.

4. The properties of the Higgs boson and field as measured are to say the least, not ideal in terms of theory. In some sense, it would have been nicer if it hadn't been found at all! (It might yet be that these properties are explained by the Higgs being a composite particle itself.)

To put it another way, there is a tremendous incentive for particle physicists to similarly produce the discovery of SUSY via an LSP candidate, or indeed any new signal post-2012. Have the bureaucrats been too busy with congratulatory backslapping to cook something up?

I'm astounded by the small-mindedness of it all by someone professing to be so learned. We've been clever enough to discover things that are far removed from our every day experience. But there remoteness does not preclude them from ever being useful in our lives, though it may well take time for the seeds of discovery to bear the fruit of utility.

Expand full comment
Erik's avatar

Impressive levels of irreverence here. Probably more useful to re-direct this energy and momentum to pick apart big pharma RCTs, where neither data nor analyses are out in the open. Particle physics receives a lot of sunlight, so to speak, and other uses of statistics, with arguably more direct (and negative) consequences, ought to be scrutinized with this level of motivation more often.

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts