Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Indy Neogy's avatar

I had some tangential info about the competition as it was going on, as I know an anthropologist who was doing some work with Netflix at the time. What I will note is that the contextless recommendation setups (i.e. content doesn't matter) didn't really do much for users. And this basically leads us to where we are with streaming today. Oversimplifying to keep it short: "finding something people will watch" is very different to "helping people find something they want" - but the latter only matters when there is real competition (which Netflix at the time, did not suffer from).

Expand full comment
Johan Ugander's avatar

Interesting rant! A relevant dimension to the Netflix prize aftermath is that quirky fact that movie rental/viewing records are one of the few things that actually have a privacy law in the United States. See the wikipedia page for the so-called Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) and the bits about Robert Bork. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_Privacy_Protection_Act

I am not a lawyer, but I've come to understand that the VPPA was the main legal hook for many of the lawsuits against Facebook Beacon as well as many other US privacy lawsuits in the modern era, most of which have settled. To be a bit simplistic, Facebook had a privacy issue and it sorta didn't matter under US law, but for the fact that it was leaking video viewing history.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts