Dutch Books and Book Reviews
In lieu of regular blogging, here's a review of Nate Silver's new book.
Hey there, argmin readers! I’ve been on hiatus finishing up some other writing projects, but I’ll be back to regular blogging on Monday.
In the meantime, I wanted to share a piece I wrote with Leif Weatherby for The Point reviewing Nate Silver’s new book On The Edge. My first book review! Thanks to Leif for inviting me to collaborate on this, and thanks to The Point for the opportunity.
Here’s a preview:
In the field of Bayesian statistics, betting has served as a metaphor for the probabilistic calculations that we make naturally—a background, subconscious reasoning that informs every decision we make. But in moving Bayesianism out of textbooks and into the wild, Silver takes the metaphor literally, and in doing so turns a descriptive framework into a prescription for practical success. If everyday reasoning looks like betting, then in order to come out on top, you need to spend your life at the casino—and remake the rest of the world in its image.
If I was going to caricature a statistico-philosophical mindset diametrically opposed to the one I’ve been promoting on argmin, it would be this book. On The Edge is a sprawling 500-page ode to gambling. Silver argues that the key to success is embracing the gambler’s mindset. But the book can never shake the facts that most gamblers are miserable and the house always wins.
The review discusses Silver’s history, the bizarre implications of literal interpretations of subjective probability, and the various houses that stack the odds against us, preying on our love and fear of risk.
Read the review here! I’m looking forward to stirring the pot some more on Monday.
Excellent review. Making money off your own risk is, even when you can do it successfully, for the “working stiffs” of the River: day traders, professional poker players, etc. The River’s true players, as you observe, get their edge by making money off other people’s risk: casino owners, Robinhood, Vanguard, DraftKings.
If expected value is the only lodestar for our decisions, then it’s impossible to say where the “honest” search for better odds ends and the exploitative construction of “house advantage” begins. The best bet is always one you can’t lose, right?
The only way to win the gamblings w/o 'luck' is to beat the math folks who structured the probabilities of the games? I was thinking of this when traveling in vegas. I tried to figure out the audience of casinos and why they got so addicted to those not-so-fun games. I didn't gamble at all but just collected the residual points which the gamblers left, and transacted about 30 dollars by end which was enough to find a good buffet place for a meal😶